DECISIONS

Decision Information

Decision Content

E-10 STATE OF WASHINGTON 4L7 ' BEFORE THE I JBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATION~ ~OMMISSION ) In the Matter of the Petition of ) TYPE OF PROCEDURE: (Check One) ) HOTEL, MOTEL, RESTAURANT EMPLOYEES (]] - Representation Election ) & BARTENDERS UNION, LOCAL 8 ) [] - Cross-check of Records ) Involving Certain Employees of CONDUCTED PURSUANT TO: (Check One) ) ) CI] - Consent Agreement CITY OF SEATTLE (DEPARTMENT OF ) 0 - PERC Direction LIGHTING) ) ~~~~~~~~~-) Case Number 3774-E-81-717 Oeci s ion Number 1312 - PECB CERTIFICATION Appearances: For Petitioner: JERRY MENDENHALL For Employer: WILLIAM HAUSKINS FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The above-named Petitioner timely filed with the Commission a petition for investigation of a question concerning representation of employees of the above-named employer; said petition was accompanied by a showing of interest which was administratively determined by the Commission to be sufficient; and the employer declined voluntarily to extend recognition to the Petitioner as the exclusive bargaining representative of its employees. 2. The organization(s), if any, listed as intervenors above timely moved for intervention in the captioned proceedings; and said motion(s) for intervention was in each case supported by a showing of interest which was administratively determined by the Commission to be sufficient. 3. These representation proceedings were conducted by the Commission in the bargaining unit described as: INCLUDED: Camp Service Aide Camp Service Aide, Senior EXCLUDED: All others 4. All proceedings were conducted under the supervision of the Commission in a manner designed to afford the affected employees a free choice in the select­ion of their bargaining representative, if any; a tally of the results was pre­viously furnished to the parties and is attached hereto; and no meritorious ob­jections have been filed with respect to these proceedings. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The unit described in finding of fact number 3 is an appropriate unit for the purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning of RCW 41.56 and all conditions precedent to a certification have been met. NOW, THEREFORE, it is CERTIFIED The majority of the employees of the above named employer employed in the appro­priate collective bargaining unit described in finding of fact number 3 have chosen: HOTEL, MOTEL, RESTAURANT EMPLOYEES AND BARTENDERS UNION, LOCAL 8 as their representative for the purposes of collective bargaining with their employer with respect to wages, hours and conditions of employment. Issued at OLYMPIA , Washington, this 3rd day of DECEMBER 19Jg_. PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RPTIO By: MARVIN I. Sr.HURKE. Executive Director
E-9 1/7~. r STATE OF WASHINGTON BEFORE THE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION T A L L Y S H E E T NAME OF CASE EMPLOYER CITY OF SEATTLE (Department of Li;ghting):. NUMBER 3774-E-81-717 The undersigned age'nt···of.,JJ1e Public Employment Relations ~'°Rill sion certifies that he/she has conducted a cros·s·.:.:che<*of records in ..t be"'"at5ov'e case, and that the re­sults were as fa 11 ows: · . . ,,, ..... ··" · '" ':hkt)*'t Number-.of Employees in Bargaini11g .. l:Jnff~··~··:.:·:·:·~··::h~~~···················· . />P"""' ,, ----Number of Emp 1o y~,e .... Reccfrd~··Exami ned ......................... . ,,,y ~er'''i:rt''[~·~;oyee Records Counted as Va 1i d Evidence of Representation .. ·----"""'...-PART 2 - SECRET BALLOT ELECTION The undersigned agent of the Public Employment Relations Conmission certifies that the results of the tabulation of ballots cast in the election held in the above case, and concluded on the date indicated below, were as follows: 1. Approximate number of eligible voters ................................ /.5 2. Void Ballots......................................................... CJ HOTEL, MOTEL, RESTAURANT 3. Votes Cast For: EMPLOYEES AND BARTENDERS UNION, LOCAL 8 8 4. Votes Cast For: 5. Votes Cast For: --------------------6. Votes Cast For: NO REPRESENTATION.................................... ft? 7. Valid,Ballots'Counted.(total of 3, 4, 5, and 6) ...................... /Y 8. Cha 11 e.n9ed Ba 11 ots . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . / 9. Valid Ballots Counted plus Challenged Ballots (total of 7 and 8) ..... /~ 10. Number of Valid Ballots Needed to Determine Election................. ff Challenges~:~: not sufficient in number to affect the results of the election. . []inconclusive. The results of the election appear to be JgJ conclusive favoring choice on 1i ne ~ PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS CO MISSION DATE ISSUED /()~;20~/?K'/ ~~~~~~·~~~~~L_-I The undersigned acted as authorized observers i the counting and tabulating of ballots indicated above. We hereby certify that the counting and tabulating were fairly and accurately done, that the secrecy of the ballots was maintained, and that the results were as indicated above. We also acknowledge service of t ·s tally.
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.