DECISIONS

Decision Information

Decision Content

STATE OF WASHINGTON

 

BEFORE THE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION

 

In the matter of the petition of:

 

SHERRI CLARKE

 

Involving certain employees of:

 

WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY

 

CASE 27141-E-15

 

DECISION 12396-A - PSRA

 

 

CERTIFICATION

Representation Election

by Agreement of Parties

 

 

Sherri Clarke, the decertification petitioner.

 

Kendra Wilkins-Fontenot, Labor Relations Officer, for the employer, Washington State University.

 

Lewis Woods, Director of PERC Activities, for the intervenor, Washington Federation of State Employees.

 

                                                            FINDINGS OF FACT

 

1.                  Sherri Clarke filed with the Public Employment Relations Commission a petition for investigation of a question concerning representation of employees of the above-named employer.  The petition was timely filed and was accompanied by a showing of interest which was administratively determined by the Commission to be sufficient.

 

2.                  The Washington Federation of State Employees is the incumbent labor organization that represented the petitioned-for employees and was granted status as intervenor in this proceeding.

 

3.                  These representation proceedings were conducted by the Commission in the bargaining unit described as:

 

All non-supervisory civil service employees of the Washington State University Western Washington and Wenatchee Tree Fruit Research and Extension Centers, excluding confidential employees, internal auditors, supervisors, employees in other bargaining units, and employees historically excluded from the bargaining unit by orders of the Washington State Personnel Resources Board or its predecessors.

 

4.                  All proceedings were conducted under the supervision of the Commission in a manner designed to afford the affected employees a free choice in the selection of their bargaining representative, if any; a tally of the results previously furnished to the parties is attached hereto; and no meritorious objections have been filed with respect to these proceedings.

 

                                           CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

 

1.                  The unit described in paragraph 3 of the foregoing Findings of Fact is an appropriate unit for the purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning of RCW 41.80.070.

 

2.                  All conditions precedent to a certification have been met.

 

 

NOW, THEREFORE, it is

 

                                                                    CERTIFIED

 

The employees of the above-named employer in the appropriate bargaining unit described in paragraph 3 of the foregoing Findings of Fact have chosen:

 

                                                         NO REPRESENTATION

 

as their representative for the purpose of collective bargaining with their employer.

 

                       

Issued at Olympia, Washington, this  18th  day of August, 2015.

 

 

PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION

 

 

 

MICHAEL P. SELLARS, Executive Director

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.