INTEREST ARBITRATIONS

Decision Information

Decision Content

Bremerton Patrolmen’s Association

And

City of Bremerton

Interest Arbitration

Arbitrator:      Ronald Hoh

Date Issued:   03/02/1990

 

 

Arbitrator:         Hoh; Ronald

Case #:              08092-I-89-00184

Employer:          City of Bremerton

Union:                Bremerton Patrolmen's Association

Date Issued:     03/02/1990

 

 

CITY OF BREMERTON, WASHINGTON            WASHINGTON PERC

                                                                                    CASE NO. 8092-I-89-184

AND

                                                                                    RONALD HOH

BREMERTON PATROLMEN'S                            Mediator/Arbitrator

ASSOCIATION

 

ARBITRATION AWARD AND ORDER OF CASE DISMISSAL

      This proceeding arises pursuant to Washington Revised Code

(hereinafter RCW) 41.56.030(6) and 41.56.450 et. seq. Being unable

to agree upon the terms of a new collective bargaining agreement in

their negotiations and in mediation, the above named parties

selected the undersigned as neutral arbitrator, pursuant to RCW

41.56.470, to make "written findings of fact and a written

determination of the issues in disputes" with regard to ten

remaining issues certified for arbitration by the Washington Public

Employment Relations Commission on July 20, 1989. The hearing was

thereafter scheduled for November 30 and December 1 and 2, 1989.

On November 28, the parties agreed: 1) to waive the arbitration

panel requirements of RCW 41.56.450; 2) that the undersigned

should act as a mediator/arbitrator during the scheduled hearing

dates rather than conduct an immediate arbitration hearing; and 3)

that there were no statutory or constitutional impediments to

prevent the parties from engaging in mediation/arbitration.

      Mediation sessions were thereafter held by the

mediator/arbitrator with the parties on November 30 and December 1,

1989. With the assistance of the mediator/arbitrator, the parties

reached total agreement on all outstanding issues on December 1,

1989. The parties agreed at that time that the mediator/arbitrator

should, upon receipt of completed and executed copies of the new

collective bargaining agreement, memorialize the parties' voluntary

agreement as an arbitration award, and dismiss the case in his

function as a "state agency" in accordance with RCW 41.56.452.

Those executed copies of the new collective bargaining agreement

were received by the undersigned on February 13, 1990, and this

award is thus rendered pursuant to RCW 41.56.452 and the parties'

agreement.

      In their voluntary agreement reached on December 1, 1989, the

parties agreed to resolve the outstanding issues as follows:

1.   UNION SECURITY (ARTICLE 4.2) The City's proposal, with

the exception that the words "An employee not a member of

the Association prior to September 3, 1986 shall not be

subject to this Article" shall be inserted at the end of

that proposal.

2.   WAGES (ARTICLE 6 AND APPENDIX A) All bargaining unit

employees shall receive the following wage increases:

5% increase retroactive to July 1, 1989;

5% increase effective July 1, 1990;

5% increase effective January 1, 1991;

5% increase effective October 1, 1991.

3.   CALL BACK (ARTICLE 7) - City proposal.

4.   VACATION (ARTICLE 9.1) - Current language.

5.   LEOFF I SICK LEAVE (ARTICLE 11.8) - Status quo (Union

proposal).

6.   BEREAVEMENT (ARTICLE 12.1) - Current language.

7.   INSURANCE (ARTICLE 14)

AWC plan for the period of 1/1/89-12/31/89.

KPS plan effective 1/1/90 through end of contract.

The City agrees to pay the entire single and dependent

premium until 7/1/90. Thereafter, the employee will pay

$7.00 per dependent per month, up to a maximum of $21 per

month, during the remainder of the contract term.

8.   HOLIDAY OVERTIME (ARTICLE 10.3) - Current language, with

the following clarification:

"Detectives and other employees on special assignments

shall be required to take off the designated family

holidays set forth in Section 2 of this Article, and

shall not work on those days absent approval by that

employee's immediate supervisor."

9.   INTERVIEW GUIDELINES (APPENDIX B) - Status quo, except

that this provision will be incorporated into a new

contract provision in Article 16.5.

10. TERM OF AGREEMENT (ARTICLE 22) - January 1, 1989 through

and including December 31, 1991.

 

      The mediator/arbitrator hereby adopts the above described

agreement of the parties as the arbitration award in this matter.

Pursuant to that agreement and award, and in accordance with my

function as a "state agency" under RCW 41.56.452, the above

captioned matter is, therefore, dismissed.

 

March 2, 1990                        /s/

                                                RONALD HOH

                                                Arbitrator/Mediator

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.