DECISIONS

Decision Information

Decision Content

Lind-Ritzville Cooperative School District, Decision 13394 (PECB, 2021)

 

 

STATE OF WASHINGTON

 

BEFORE THE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION

 

In the matter of the petition of:

 

Public School Employees

of Washington

 

For clarification of an existing bargaining unit of employees of:

 

LinD-Ritzville Cooperative School District

 

 

CASE 134324-C-10

 

DECISION 13394 - PECB

 

 

ORDER CLARIFYING
BARGAINING UNIT

 

 

Christopher Mobley, Field Representative/Administrative Organizer, for the Public School Employees of Washington.

 

Donald Vanderholm, Superintendent, for the Lind-Ritzville Cooperative School District.

 

On July 12, 2021, Public School Employees of Washington (PSE) filed a unit clarification petition seeking to merge its two existing bargaining units at the Lind-Ritzville Cooperative School District (employer). The Lind-Ritzville Cooperative Schools came into existence in August 2021 when the Lind School District and Ritzville School District combined to serve the students of both communities. Prior to the merger, the union represented a bargaining unit at the Ritzville School District consisting of all classified employees in the Transportation, Custodial/Maintenance, Food Service, and Paraeducator job classes. Prior to the merger the union also represented a bargaining unit of employees at the Lind School District consisting of all classified employees of the district. See Lind School District, Decision 4499 (PECB, 1993).

 

After the merger of the two school districts, the union continued to represent both bargaining units but the parties negotiated a single collective bargaining agreement that covered all employees. PSE provided a signed notarized affidavit indicating that the members of both bargaining units had voted in favor of merging the bargaining units. Additionally, the employer has indicated that it supported the union’s request to the merge the bargaining units.

 

The issues in this case are whether: (1) whether parties have agreed that the two bargaining units can be merged, and (2) whether the proposed merger of the two bargaining units results in an appropriate bargaining unit. Because the parties have agreed to merge the bargaining units and the resulting bargaining unit is an appropriate bargaining unit under RCW 41.56.060, the proposed merger is granted.

 

ANALYSIS

 

Applicable Legal Standards

The authority to determine and certify appropriate bargaining units is a function of the Legislature delegated to this Commission. RCW 41.80.070; Central Washington University, Decision 10215‑B (PSRA, 2010). Included with this authority is the power to, upon request, modify that unit through a unit clarification proceeding. See Pierce County, Decision 7018-A (PECB, 2001).

 

Although this agency has the authority to determine and modify bargaining units, an employer may extend voluntary recognition under chapter 41.56 RCW to representatives of groups of employees for the purposes of collective bargaining. Toppenish School District, Decision 10394‑B (PECB, 2011). An employer and union are required to submit representation matters to this agency only if there is a dispute regarding representation. RCW 41.56.050; Toppenish School District, Decision 10394-B. If such recognition is extended, the employer is then obligated to bargain with the union. City of Kennewick, Decision 482-B (PECB, 1980).

 

Merger of Bargaining Units

Prior to 2011, a bargaining representative who wanted to merge two or more bargaining units of employees that it represented in an employer’s workforce was required to file a unit merger petition under WAC 391-25-420. This agency would first determine if the resulting bargaining unit would be an appropriate bargaining unit under RCW 41.56.060. If the resulting bargaining unit was an appropriate bargaining unit, then a representation election would be conducted to determine if the employees in both bargaining units desired the merger. WAC 391-25-420(2)(d)(ii). If either bargaining unit rejected the merger, then the petition would be dismissed. WAC 391-25-420(2)(d)(i).

 

In 2011, the Legislature amended RCW 41.56.050 to allow an employer and union to agree to merge two or more bargaining units without the need of a representation election. RCW 41.56.050(2). Thus, if the parties are in agreement about the merger, they are not required to submit the matter to this agency. In the event that there is a disagreement between the parties about the proposed merger, the parties could then submit the matter to this agency, the WAC 391-25-420 merger rule would apply, and this agency would conduct an election.

 

Although RCW 41.56.050(2) only requires parties to submit merger disputes to this agency if there is disagreement, parties may nevertheless seek a determination from this agency as to whether the merger of two existing bargaining units would result in an appropriate bargaining unit under RCW 41.56.060. If the resulting bargaining unit is appropriate on its face, then a certification may be issued for the newly merged bargaining unit.[1] This will provide the parties with an assurance that the bargaining unit conforms to the RCW 41.56.060 statutory requirements.

 

This process is consistent with a similar process that exists for state civil employees who collectively bargain under chapter 41.80 RCW. RCW 41.80.070(3) states that a union representing two or more bargaining units of state civil service employees may petition this agency to merge those bargaining units. The only question that this agency asks is whether the resulting bargaining unit is appropriate under the unit determination standards and, if so, then a certification will be issued.

 

Application of Standards

In this case, the parties agreed that the two existing PSE bargaining units can be merged to form a single bargaining unit of employees. PSE also submitted an affidavit demonstrating that the employees in both bargaining units are in favor of the merger. Thus, the parties are not in dispute about the merger.

 

The only question is whether the resulting bargaining unit is appropriate. While PSE represents two bargaining units, the union and employer negotiate a single collective bargaining agreement that covers both bargaining units. Each of PSE’s bargaining units include the general job classes that are listed in the recognition agreements of the collective bargaining agreement, including Custodians, Food Service, Paraeducators, Preschool Teacher, Lind Secretaries, and Lind Transportation. Any employee that fits within the general job class description is considered in each bargaining unit and newly hired employees that fit within the job classes would be included in the bargaining unit.

 

A merged bargaining unit consisting of the employees in the Custodians, Food Service, Paraeducators, Preschool Teacher, Lind Secretaries, and Lind Transportation is an appropriate bargaining unit under the statute. All of the employees in these general job classes would be included in the bargaining unit and nothing suggests that work jurisdiction issues would be created.

 

FINDINGS OF FACT

 

1.                  The Lind-Ritzville Cooperative School District (employer) is an employer within the meaning of RCW 41.56.030(12).

 

2.                  Public School Employees of Washington (PSE) is an exclusive bargaining representative within the meaning of RCW 41.56.030(2).

 

3.                  The Lind-Ritzville Cooperative Schools came into existence in August 2021 when the Lind School District and Ritzville School District combined to serve the students of both communities.

 

4.                  Prior to the merger, the union represented a bargaining unit at the Ritzville School District consisting of all classified employees in the Transportation, Custodial/Maintenance, Food Service, and Paraeducator job classes.

 

5.                  Prior to the merger the union also represented a bargaining unit of employees at the Lind School District consisting of all classified employees of the district.

 

6.                  After the merger of the two school districts, the union continued to represent both bargaining unit but the parties negotiated a single collective bargaining agreement that covered all employees.

 

7.                  PSE and the employer agree that the bargaining units described in findings of fact 4 and 5 can be merged to form a single bargaining unit.

 

8.                  The employees in the bargaining units described in findings of fact 4 and 5 share a community of interest.

 

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

 

1.                  The Public Employment Relations Commission has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to chapter 41.56 RCW and chapter 391-35 WAC.

 

2.                  Based upon findings of fact 7 and 8, a bargaining unit consisting of the employees described in findings of fact 4 and 5 is an appropriate bargaining unit under RCW 41.56.060.

 

ORDER

 

The bargaining units described in findings of fact 4 and 5 that are represented by Public School Employees of Washington are merged to form a single bargaining unit described as follows:

 

All full-time and regular part-time employees of the Lind-Ritzville Cooperative School District in the following general job classes: Custodians, Lind Secretaries, Lind Transportation, Food Service, Paraeducator, and Preschool Teacher; excluding supervisors, confidential employees, and all other employees.

 

ISSUED at Olympia, Washington, this  17th  day of August, 2021.

 

 

PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION

 

 

 

MICHAEL P. SELLARS, Executive Director

 

 

This order will be the final order of the

agency unless a notice of appeal is filed

with the Commission under WAC 391-35-210.



[1]            Because the merger has been achieved without a representation election, a certification bar is not created through this type of merger.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.