DECISIONS

Decision Information

Decision Content

Onalaska School District, Decision 13280 (EDUC, 2020)

STATE OF WASHINGTON

BEFORE THE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION

RENEE NELSON,

Complainant,

vs.

ONALASKA SCHOOL DISTRICT,

Respondent.

CASE 133106-U-20

DECISION 13280 - EDUC

order of dismissal

Renee Nelson, the complainant.

Jeff Davis, Superintendent, for the Onalaska School District.

On October 22, 2020, Renee Nelson (complainant) filed an unfair labor practice complaint against the Onalaska School District (employer). The complaint was reviewed under WAC 391-45-110.[1] A deficiency notice issued on November 12, 2020, notified the complainant that a cause of action could not be found at that time. The complainant was given a period of 21 days in which to file and serve an amended complaint or face dismissal of the case. On December 3, 2020, the complainant was granted a one week extension to file an amended complaint.

On December 10, 2020, the complainant filed an amended complaint. The Unfair Labor Practice Administrator dismisses the amended complaint for timeliness and failure to state a cause of action.

ISSUE

The amended complaint does not allege unfair labor practice violations against the employer.

Because the amended complaint lacks facts alleging an employer unfair labor practice violation, the amended complaint, as it relates to case 133106-U-20 is dismissed.

ANALYSIS

In the original complaint filed, the complainant alleged the employer committed a Weingarten right violation and other violations outside the Commission’s jurisdiction. The complainant filed an amended complaint. The amended complaint referenced both cases 133106-U-20 (against the employer) and 133107-U-20 (against the union).

The complaint does not describe any employer violations within the Commission’s jurisdiction. The Commission’s jurisdiction is limited to the resolution of collective bargaining disputes between employers, employees, and unions. The agency does not have authority to resolve all disputes that might arise in public employment. Tacoma School District (Tacoma Education Association), Decision 5086-A (EDUC, 1995). Just because the complaints do not state a cause of action for an unfair labor practice it does not necessarily mean the allegations involve lawful activity. It means that the issues are not matters within the purview of the Commission. Tacoma School District (Tacoma Education Association), Decision 5086-A

The amended complaint includes allegations that the union committed a violation, but does not include allegations against the employer. Because the complaint does not include allegations against the employer, case 133106-U-20 must be dismissed.

Order

The amended complaint charging unfair labor practices in the above-captioned matter is DISMISSED for failure to state a cause of action.

ISSUED at Olympia, Washington, this  22nd  day of December, 2020.

PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION

Emily K. Whitney, Unfair Labor Practice Administrator

This order will be the final order of the
agency unless a notice of appeal is filed
with the Commission under WAC 391-45-350.



[1]             At this stage of the proceedings, all of the facts alleged in the complaint or amended complaint are assumed to be true and provable. The question at hand is whether, as a matter of law, the complaint states a claim for relief available through unfair labor practice proceedings before the Public Employment Relations Commission.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.