DECISIONS

Decision Information

Decision Content

Spokane County, Decision 5698-A (PECB, 1996)

STATE OF WASHINGTON

BEFORE THE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION

SPOKANE COUNTY DEPUTY SHERIFF'S ASSOCIATION,

 

Complainant,

CASE 12105-U-95-2853

vs.

DECISION 5698-A - PECB

SPOKANE COUNTY,

ORDER CORRECTING ERROR

Respondent.

 

Stamper, Rubens, Stocker & Smith, by Thomas R. Luciani, Attorney at Law, appeared for the union.

James R. Sweetser, Prosecuting Attorney, by Martin F. Muench, Deputy Prosecuting Attorney, appeared for the employer.

This case comes before the Commission by its own motion, pursuant to WAC 391-45-350, to review a decision issued by Examiner Rex L. Lacy.[1]

The Examiner found that the employer committed both a "refusal to bargain" violation under RCW 41.56.140(4) and an "interference" violation under RCW 41.56.140(1). At pages 15-16 of his decision, the Examiner found that an extraordinary remedy of attorney fees was warranted based upon the employer's assertion of frivolous defenses and to make an effective order on interference with the dispute resolution mechanisms of Chapter 41.56 RCW. The basis for an extraordinary remedy was set forth in paragraph 5 of the Examiner's conclusions of law, and the compliance notice attached to the Examiner's decision made reference to the attorney fees, but the extraordinary remedy appears to have been inadvertently omitted from the "Order" portion of the Examiner's decision. The sole purpose for the Commission taking the case under WAC 391-45-350 was to correct that evident error, and our order herein is confined to correcting the Order to include the award of attorney fees.[2]

NOW, THEREFORE, The following amended order is substituted for the order issued in this matter by Examiner Rex L. Lacy:

ORDER

Spokane County, its officers and agents, shall immediately take the following actions to remedy its unfair labor practices:

1.         CEASE AND DESIST from:

(a)        Refusing to bargain, upon request, concerning proposed shift changes for employees in the bargaining unit.

(b)        Threatening employees with adverse effects due to the pursuit of bargaining rights and or dispute resolution procedures provided by law.

(c)        In any other manner, interfering with, restricting or coercing its employees in their exercise of their collective bargaining rights secured by the laws of the State of Washington.

2.         TAKE THE FOLLOWING AFFIRMATIVE ACTION to effectuate the purpose and policies of Chapter 41.56 RCW.

(A)       Restore the 4/10 work schedule for all bargaining unit positions affected by the unilateral changes of work schedule found unlawful in this proceeding.

(B)       Make employees affected by the unlawful changes of work schedule whole, by immediate payment of compensation equivalent to four hours at the straight time rate in effect during the week, for each week in which the employee was scheduled for a fifth shift under the 5/8 schedule. The employer shall be entitled to offset amounts paid for overtime for ninth and tenth hours worked on the first through fourth shifts of a week under the 5/8 schedule. Such back pay shall be computed with interest, in accordance with WAC 391-45-410, for each week from the date of the unilateral change to the date on which the 4/10 work schedule is reinstated pursuant to this order.

(C)       Give notice to the Spokane County Deputy Sheriff's Association and provide opportunity for collective bargaining, prior to any future change of work schedules for employees in the bargaining unit represented by that organization.

(D)       If bargaining is requested on any future change of work schedules, bargain in good faith and utilize the procedures of RCW 41.56.440 and .450.

(E)       Reimburse Spokane County Deputy Sheriff's Association for its reasonable attorney fees incurred in the prosecution of this case, upon presentation of a sworn and itemized statement of such costs and fees.

(F)        Post, in conspicuous places on the employer's premises where notices to all employees are usually posted, copies of the notice attached hereto and marked "Appendix". Such notices shall be duly signed by an authorized representative of the above-named respondent, and shall remain posted for 60 days. Reasonable steps shall be taken by the above-named respondent to ensure that such notices are not removed, altered, defaced, or covered by other material.

(G)       Notify the above-named complainant, in writing, within 20 days following the date of this order, as to what steps have been taken to comply with this order, and at the same time provide the above-named complainant with a signed copy of the notice required by the preceding paragraph.

(H)       Notify the Executive Director of the Public Employment Relations Commission, in writing, within 30 days following the date of this order, as to what steps have been taken to comply with this order.

Dated at Olympia, Washington, this 19th. day of November, 1996.

PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION

[SIGNED]

MARILYN GLENN SAYAN, Chairperson

[SIGNED]

SAM KINVILLE, Commissioner

[SIGNED]

JOSEPH W. DUFFY Commissioner

[SIGNED]



[1]          Spokane County, Decision 5698 (PECB, 1996).

[2]          Inasmuch as the employer has tendered compliance with the Examiner's order and that compliance includes paying the union's attorney fees, the primary effect of our order is to complete the audit trail for that expenditure. It is not expected that the employer will need to re-post the notice to employees or to re-notify the union or Executive Director of its compliance.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.