STATE OF WASHINGTON BEFORE THE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION |
|
ANNE FREDERICK, |
|
|
CASE 10129-U-92-2315 |
Complainant, |
|
vs. |
DECISION 4304 - PECB |
CITY OF EVERETT, |
|
|
ORDER OF DISMISSAL |
Respondent. |
|
On November 19, 1992, Anne Frederick submitted a number of documents to the Public Employment Relations Commission, together with an inquiry with respect to the procedures for filing a complaint with the Commission. The subject matter concerned Ms. Frederick's discharge from employment with the city of Everett on or about October 30, 1992. A file was opened under the case number indxcated above,[1] and Ms. Frederick was supplied with the statute, rules and form applicable to processing of a complaint charging unfair labor practices under Chapter 41.56 RCW and Chapter 391-45 WAC. A 14-day period initially specified for a response was extended based on the telephonic request from Ms. Frederick, but nothing further has been received from Ms. Frederick.
The case is now before the Executive Director for a preliminary ruling pursuant to WAC 391-45-110.[2] The documents now on file are insufficient, under the requirements of WAC 391-45-050, to state a claim for relief available through unfair labor practice proceedings before the Public Employment Relations Commission.
NOW. THEREFORE, it is
ORDERED
The complaint charging unfair labor practices filed in the above-captioned matter is hereby DISMISSED.
DATED at Olympia, Washington, this 11th day of February, 1993.
PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION
[SIGNED]
MARVIN L. SCHURKE, Executive Director
This order may be appealed by
filing a petition for review
with the Commission pursuant
to WAC 391-45-350
[1] The assignment of a case number is necessary to tracking of the case through the Commission's computerized case docketing system, and is consistent with Commission procedures designed to prevent "slipping between cracks".
[2] At this stage of the proceedings, all of the facts alleged in a complaint are assumed to be true and provable.