DECISIONS

Decision Information

Decision Content

STATE OF WASHINGTON

BEFORE THE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION

ANNE FREDERICK,

 

 

CASE 10129-U-92-2315

Complainant,

 

vs.

DECISION 4304 - PECB

CITY OF EVERETT,

 

 

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Respondent.

 

On November 19, 1992, Anne Frederick submitted a number of documents to the Public Employment Relations Commission, together with an inquiry with respect to the procedures for filing a complaint with the Commission. The subject matter concerned Ms. Frederick's discharge from employment with the city of Everett on or about October 30, 1992. A file was opened under the case number  indxcated above,[1] and Ms. Frederick was supplied with the statute, rules and form applicable to processing of a complaint charging unfair labor practices under Chapter 41.56 RCW and Chapter 391-45 WAC. A 14-day period initially specified for a response was extended based on the telephonic request from Ms. Frederick, but nothing further has been received from Ms. Frederick.

The case is now before the Executive Director for a preliminary ruling pursuant to WAC 391-45-110.[2] The documents now on file are insufficient, under the requirements of WAC 391-45-050, to state a claim for relief available through unfair labor practice proceedings before the Public Employment Relations Commission.

NOW. THEREFORE, it is

ORDERED

The complaint charging unfair labor practices filed in the above-captioned matter is hereby DISMISSED.

DATED at Olympia, Washington, this 11th day of February, 1993.

PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION

[SIGNED]

MARVIN L. SCHURKE, Executive Director

This order may be appealed by

filing a petition for review

with the Commission pursuant

to WAC 391-45-350



[1]          The assignment of a case number is necessary to tracking of the case through the Commission's computerized case docketing system, and is consistent with Commission procedures designed to prevent "slipping between cracks".

[2]          At this stage of the proceedings, all of the facts alleged in a complaint are assumed to be true and provable.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.