DECISIONS

Decision Information

Decision Content

Kittitas Valley Community Hospital, Decision 6322 (PECB, 1998)

STATE OF WASHINGTON

BEFORE THE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION

In the matter of the petition of:

 

TEAMSTERS UNION, LOCAL 524

CASE 13873-E-98-2320

Involving certain employees of:

DECISION 6322 - PECB

KITTITAS VALLEY COMMUNITY HOSPITAL

DIRECTION OF CROSS-CHECK

Bob Graham, Union Representative, appeared on behalf of the union.

Fred Lorenz, Labor Consultant and Eric Jensen, Administrator, appeared on behalf of the employer.

On April 27, 1998, Teamsters, Local 524, filed a petition for investigation of a question concerning representation with the Public Employment Relations Commission under Chapter 391-25 WAC, seeking certification as exclusive bargaining representative of certain employees of the Kittitas Valley Community Hospital.

An investigation conference was conducted by telephone conference call on June 4, 1998. The parties disagreed about the method to determine the question concerning representation. The union stated a preference for a cross-check, while the employer objected to the use of the cross-check procedure. The dispute concerning methodology was referred to the Executive Director.

RCW 41.56.060 sets forth the methods for determining questions concerning representation:

The Commission shall determine the bargaining representative by (1) examination of organization memberships roles, (2) comparison of signatures on organization bargaining authorization cards, or (3) by conducting an election specifically therefor.

The Commission’s rules limit the availability of the “cross-check” procedure, as follows:

WAC 391-25-391 Special Provision--Public Employees. Where only one organization is seeking certification as the representative of interest submitted in support of the petition indicates that the organization has been authorized by in excess of seventy percent of the employees to act as their representative for the purposes of collective bargaining, the executive director may issue a direction of cross-check. The direction of cross-check and any accompanying rules shall not be subject to review by the Commission except upon objections timely filed under WAC 391-25-590.

[Emphasis by bold supplied]

Employers occasionally oppose the use of the cross-check procedure on the basis of a general preference for elections.

Examination of the case file indicates that the union submitted the kind of substantial showing of interest required by WAC 391-25-391. The union’s showing of interest in excess of 70% inherently indicates little likelihood of an election altering the result.

DIRECTION OF CROSS-CHECK

1.                  A cross-check or records shall be made under the direction of the Public Employment Relations Commission in the appropriate bargaining unit described as:

All full-time, regular part-time and per diem employees of the Kittitas Valley Community Hospital excluding, supervisors, confidential employees, RN’s, LPN’S, office clerical, security, laboratory, imaging, surgical technicians, and home care, engineering, physical rehab, materials management, central supply and pharmacy

to determine whether a majority of the employees in that bargaining unit have authorized the Teamsters, Local 524, to represent them for purposes collective bargaining.

2.                  The employer shall immediately supply the Commission with copies of documents from its employment records which bear the signatures of the employees on the eligibility list stipulated by the parties.

Issued at Olympia, Washington, on the 15th day of June, 1998.

PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION

[SIGNED]

MARVIN L. SCHURKE, Executive Director

This order may be appealed by filing timely objections with the Commission pursuant to WAC 391-25-590.

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.