E-10 STATE OF WASHINGTON 4/77 BEFORE THE ~LIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS.MMISSION ) In the Matter of the Petition of ) TYPE OF PROCEDURE: (Check One) ) PUBLIC SCHOOL EMPLOYEES OF [] - Representation Election ) WASHINGTON ) 0 - Cross-check of Records ) CONDUCTED PURSUANT TO: (Check One) Involving Certain Employees of ) ) L]) Consent Agreement MONTESANO SCHOOL DIST RI CT NO. 66 ) 0 - PERC Direction _______________ ) ) Case Number 3758-E-81-715 Decision Number 1332 - PECB CERTIFICATION Appearances: For Petitioner: DAVID R. LOOMIS For Employer: DICK TORRENS FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The above-named Petitioner timely filed with the Commission a petition for investigation of a question concerning representation of employees of the above-named employer; said petition was accompanied by a showing of interest which was administratively determined by the Commission to be sufficient; and the employer declined voluntarily to extend recognition to the Petitioner as the exclusive bargaining representative of its employees. 2. The organization(s), if any, listed as intervenors above timely moved for intervention in the captioned proceedings; and said motion(s) for intervention was in each case supported by a showing of interest which was administratively determined by the ColTITlission to be sufficient. 3. These representation proceedings were conducted by the Co1T1Tiission in the bargaining unit described as: ALL CLASSIFIED SCHOOL TRANSPORTATION EMPLOYEES. EXCLLDED: SUPERVISORS AND CONFIDENTIAL EMPLOYEES. 4. All proceedings were conducted under the superv1s1on of the Conmission in a manner designed to afford the affected employees a free choice in the selection of their bargaining representative, if any; a tally of the results was previously furnished to the parties and is attached hereto; and no meritorious objections have been filed with respect to these proceedings. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The unit described in finding of fact number 3 is an appropriate unit for the purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning of RCW ---'-~4:1c.5.;6: _ ____ and all conditions precedent to a certification have been met. NOW, THEREFORE, it is CERTIFIED The majority of the employees of the above named employer employed in the appropriate collective bargaining unit described in finding of fact number 3 have chosen: NO REPRESENTATION as their representative for the purposes of collective bargaining with their employer with respect to wages, hours and conditions of employment. Issued at OLYMPIA , Washington, this 17th day of __DE_ C_E_M_BE_R __ , 19_Jg_
E-9 1. /, 78 • STATE OF WASHINGTON • BEFORE THE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION T A L L Y S HE E T NAME OF EMPLOYER MONTESANO SCHOOL DISTRICT, NO. 66 CASE 3758-E-81-715 NUMBER __~ ~~--~ PART I - CROSS-CHECK OF RECORDS The undersigned agent of the Public Employment Relations Corrmission certifies that he/she has conducted a cross-check of records in the above case, and that the results were as follows: Number of Employees in Bargaining Unit .................................. . ----Number of Employee Records Examined ..................................... . ----Number of Employee Records Counted as Valid Evidence of Representation ... ----PART 2 - SECRET BALLOT ELECTION The undersigned agent of the Public Employment Relations Corrmission certifies that the results of the tabulation of ballots cast in the election held in the above case, and concluded on the date indicated below, were as follows: 1. Approximate number of eligible voters................................ 9 2. Void Ballots ...............•......................................... - ---3. Votes Cast For: PUBLIC SCHOOL EMPLOYEES OF WASHINGTON 3 4. Votes Cast For: 5. Votes Cast For: 6. Votes Cast For: NO REPRESENTATION.................................... ~ 7. Valid Ballots Counted.(total of 3, 4, 5, and 6)...................... 9 8. Cha 11 enged Ba 11 ots . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1 9. Valid Ballots Counted plus Challenged Ballots (total of 7 and 8)..... 1() 10. Number of Valid Ballots Needed to Determine Election................. G, Challenges~:~: not sufficient in number to affect the results of the election. · . D inconclusive. The results of the election appear to be gj conclusive favoring choi.ce on line~ DATE ISSUED N~\I. \0, \981 The undersigned acted as authorized observers n e counting and tabulating of ballots indicated above. We hereby certify t the counting and tabulating were fairly and accurately done, that the secrecy of the ballots was maintained, and that the results were as indicated above. We also acknowledge service of this tally.
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.