STATE OF BEFORE THE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION In the Matter of the Petition of AMALGAMATED TRANSIT UNION, LOCAL NO. 1015 Involving Certain Employees of SPOKANE TRANSIT AUTHORITY CERTIFICATION Appearances: For Petitioner: Steven A. Crumb, Attorney at Law For Employer: Thomas F. Kingen, Attorney at Law FINDINGS 1. The above-named Petitioner timely filed with the Commission a petition for investigation of a question concerning representation of employees of the above-named employer; said petition was accompanied by a showing of interest which was administratively determined by the Commission to be sufficient; and the employer declined voluntarily to extend recognition to the Petitioner as bargaining representative of its employees. 2. The organization(s), if any, listed as intervention in the captioned proceedings; was in each case supported by a showing of interest which was determined by the Commission to be sufficient. 3. These representation proceedings were bargaining unit described as: INCLUDED: All full-time and regular part-time employees of Spokane Transit Authority/Special Transportation Department classified as Bus Driver, Van Driver, Mechanic, Clerical, Computer Operator, Driver-Dispatcher or Custodian. EXCLUDED: All other employees of Spokane Transit Authority. 4. All proceedings were conducted under the supervision of the Commission in a manner designed to afford the affected employees a free choice in the selection of their bargaining representative, if any; a tally of the results was previously furnished to the parties and is attached hereto; have been filed with respect to these proceedings. CONCLUSIONS The unit described in finding of fact number 3 is an purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning of RCW 41.56.060 conditions precedent to a certification have been met. NOW, THEREFORE, it is CERTIFIED The majority of the employees of the appropriate collective bargaining unit described in finding of fact number 3 have chosen: . NO REPRESENTATION as their representative for the purposes employer with respect to wages, hours and conditions of employment. Issued at Olympia , Washington, this WASHINGTON TYPE OF PROCEDURE: (Check One) I XI - Representation Election I I - Cross-Check of Records CONDUCTED PURSUANT TO: (Check One) !Y:! - Consent Agreement I I - PERC Direction Case Number 4585-E-83-844 Decision Number 1681 - PECB OF FACT the exclusive intervenors above timely moved for and said motion(s) for intervention administratively conducted by the Commission in the and no meritorious objections OF LAW appropriate unit for the ; and all above named employer employed in the of collective bargaining with their 7th day of ;September 19 83 . ~UBLIC
STATE OF WASHINGTON BEFORE THE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION T A L L Y S H E E T CASE NUMBER ~sS.S--E-83- Pc..tt..l - CROSS-CHECK OF RECORDS The undersigned age · the Public Employment Relations C that he/she has conducted a ck of records in results were as follows: Number of Emp"loyees Examined .......................... . Records Counted as Valid Evidence of PART 2 - SECRET BALLOT ELECTION (Rc~uN) The undersigned agent of the Public Employment Relations Conrnission certHies that the results of the tabulation of ballots cast in the election held in the above case, and concluded on the date indicated below, were as follows: l. Approximate number of eligible voters ....................... ......... _J_<__ 2. Void Ballots ........................................................ . -------Votes Cast For: fl.~yu. ... §A-MA~i> -;RAN..S1r0P11~ 4~ 1 /t>tS-_... / '3__ __ _ 7. Valid Ballots Counted.(total of 3, 4, 5, and 6) ...................... _~~--8. Challenged Ballots ................................................... __ --_ -_. .. . 9. Valid Ba"llots Counted plus Challenged Ballots (total of 7 and 8) ..... 30 10. Number of Valid Ballots Needed to Detecmine Election ................. 16 Challenges 8 :~:~ not suffiSient in number to affect the results of the e·lection. -· . . ! [ S ] J inconclusive. The results of the elect10n appear to be conclusive favoring choice on l'ine -~ PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION • DATE ISSUED ~tl.trt..' /,_lfK:S ___ -~-------The undersigned acted as authorized observers ·n tabulating of ballots indicated above. We hereby certify that the counting and tabulating were fairly and accurately done, that the secrecy of the ballots was maintained, and that the results were as indicated above. We also acknowledge service of this tally. :;r~~~Lfjl24C/k--~/d'r For
1/78 STATE OF WASHINGTON BEFORE THE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION T A L L Y S H E E T CASE NUMBER ~SJS:.c-J'j-3t./<f - CROSS-CHECK OF RECORDS The undersigned age the Public Employment Relations that he/she has conducted a cro results were as follows: Number of Employees PART 2 - SECRET BALLOT ELECTION The undersigned agent of the Public Employment Relations Commission certifies that the results of the tabulation of ballots cast in the election held in the above case, and concluded on the date indicated below, were as follows: l. Approximate number of eligible voters ................................ .:Ja 2. Void Ballots ........................................................ . ----3. Votes Cast For: AMA4MHA1@ 71/All/.l'1T lJ,..,1tJAJ,, Loc.-AL. .:l:f/() IS- /b 4. Votes Cast For: 6. Votes Cast For: NO REPRESENTATION.................................... __/& ... ;: ;___ 7. Valid Ballots Counted.(total of 3, 4, 5, and 6)...................... __3_2_- 8. Cha 11 e.nged Ba 11 ots ................................................... _ -_ -_ -_ 9. Valid Ballots Counted plus Challenged Ballots (total of 7 and 8) .... . 10. Number of Valid Ballots Needed to Determine Election ................ . Challenges~:~: not sufficient in number to affect the results of the election. . [] inconclusive. The results of the election appear to be~ conclusive favoring choice on line ~ PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION DATE ISSUED JVL'/ 2.S 1 [CJ/3 The undersigned acted as authorized observe~ i e o ting d t ulating of ballots indicated above. We hereby certify t the counting and tabulating were fairly and accurately done, that the secrecy of the ballots was maintained, and that the results were as indicated above. We also acknowledge service of this tally. For..SfbKAl\Jt TRAN.!'11 flll[Uoe..rry For AIU 1 Loc..AL #/D/S ~tea~.· T~t.~ For --------------
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.