STATE OF WASHINGTON BEFORE THE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION In the matter of the petition of: ) ) GARY JONES ) CASE 20983-E-07-3239 ) Involving certain employees of: ) DECISION 9769 - PSRA ) COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT 10 ) CERTIFICATION ) Representation Election ) by Agreement of Parties ___________________________________) Gary Jones, for the petitioner. Tina Peterson, Labor Relations and Lesley Hogan, Human Resources, for the employer. Gladys Burbank, Director of Activities, for the intervenor, Washington Federation of State Employees. FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The above-named petitioner filed with the Public Employment Relations Commission a petition for investigation of a question concerning representation of employees of the above-named employer. The petition was timely filed and was accompanied by a showing of interest which was administratively determined by the Commission to be sufficient. 2. The organization(s) listed above as intervenors (if applicable) timely moved for intervention in the proceedings, and each motion for intervention was supported by a showing of interest which was administratively determined by the Commission to be sufficient. 3. These representation proceedings were conducted by the Commission in the bargaining unit described as: ALL SUPERVISORS OF COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT 10 (GREEN RIVER COLLEGE) COVERED UNDER RCW 41.06 EXCLUDING CONFIDENTIAL EMPLOYEES. 4. All proceedings were conducted under the supervision of the Commission in a manner designed to afford the affected employees a free choice in the selection of their bargaining representative, if any; a tally of the results previously furnished to the parties is attached hereto; and no meritorious objections have been filed with respect to these proceedings. CONCLUSION OF LAW 1. The unit described in paragraph 3 of the foregoing Findings of Fact is an appropriate unit for the purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning of RCW 41.06. 2. All conditions precedent to a certification have been met. NOW, THEREFORE, it is CERTIFIED The employees of the above-named employer in the appropriate bargaining unit described in paragraph 3 of the foregoing Findings of Fact have chosen: NO REPRESENTATION as their representative for the purpose of collective bargaining with their employer. Issued at Olympia, Washington, this 25th day of June, 2007. PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION CATHLEEN CALLAHAN, Executive Director
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.