DECISIONS

Decision Information

Decision Content

                         STATE OF WASHINGTON

          BEFORE THE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION


In the matter of the petition of:  )
                                   )
GARY JONES                         )    CASE 20983-E-07-3239 
                                   )
Involving certain employees of:    )    DECISION 9769 - PSRA
                                   )
COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT 10      )    CERTIFICATION
                                   )    Representation Election
                                   )    by Agreement of Parties
___________________________________)    


     Gary Jones, for the petitioner.

     Tina Peterson, Labor Relations and Lesley Hogan, Human
     Resources, for the employer.

     Gladys Burbank, Director of Activities, for the intervenor,
     Washington Federation of State Employees.


                           FINDINGS OF FACT
     
1.   The above-named petitioner filed with the Public Employment
     Relations Commission a petition for investigation of a question
     concerning representation of employees of the above-named
     employer. The petition was timely filed and was accompanied by
     a showing of interest which was administratively determined by
     the Commission to be sufficient.

2.   The organization(s) listed above as intervenors (if applicable)
     timely moved for intervention in the proceedings, and each 
     motion for intervention was supported by a showing of interest
     which was administratively determined by the Commission to be 
     sufficient.

3.   These representation proceedings were conducted by the
     Commission in the bargaining unit described as:

          ALL SUPERVISORS OF COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT 10 (GREEN
          RIVER COLLEGE) COVERED UNDER RCW 41.06 EXCLUDING
          CONFIDENTIAL EMPLOYEES.

4.   All proceedings were conducted under the supervision of the
     Commission in a manner designed to afford the affected
     employees a free choice in the selection of their bargaining
     representative, if any; a tally of the results previously furnished
     to the parties is attached hereto; and no meritorious objections
     have been filed with respect to these proceedings.

                          CONCLUSION OF LAW

1.   The unit described in paragraph 3 of the foregoing Findings of
     Fact is an appropriate unit for the purposes of collective
     bargaining within the meaning of RCW 41.06.

2.   All conditions precedent to a certification have been met.


NOW, THEREFORE, it is

                              CERTIFIED

The employees of the above-named employer in the appropriate
bargaining unit described in paragraph 3 of the foregoing Findings
of Fact have chosen:


                          NO REPRESENTATION


as their representative for the purpose of collective bargaining
with their employer.


Issued at Olympia, Washington, this  25th  day of June, 2007.


                         PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION



                         CATHLEEN CALLAHAN, Executive Director
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.