DECISIONS

Decision Information

Decision Content

E- :~.O STATE OF WASHINGTON 7 BEFORE Thi.. PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATHJm) COMMISSION ) In the Matter of the Petition of ) TYPE OF PROCEDURE: (Check One) PUBLIC, PROFESSIONAL & OFFICE-CLERICAJ) (R] - Representation Election EMPLOYEES & DRIVERS, LOCAL 763/IBT ) 0 - Cross-check of Records ) Involving Certain Employees of ) CONDUCTED PURSUANT TO: (Check One) ) i]] - Consent Agreement LAKE WASHINGTON SCHOOL DISTRICT ) NO. 414 ) 0 - PERC Direction -~~~~~-~-~~~-~) Case Number 3694-E-81-704 Decision Number 1302-PECB CERTIFICATION Appearances: For Petitioner: JOHN KOMAR For Employer: REID E. STEVENS FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The above-named Petitioner timely filed with the Commission a petition for investigation of a question concerning representation of employees of the above-named employer; said petition was accompanied by a showing of interest which was administratively determined by the Commission to be sufficient; and the employer declined voluntarily to extend recognition to the Petitioner as the exclusive bargaining representative of its employees. 2. The organization(s), if any, listed as intervenors above timely moved for intervention in the captioned proceedings; and said motion(s) for intervention was in each case supported by a showing of interest which was administratively determined by the Commission to be sufficient. 3. These representation proceedings were conducted by the Commission in the bargaining unit described as: INCLUDED: All food service employees, employed by the Lake Washington School District No. 414. EXCLUDED: All other district employees and student employees. 4. All proceedings were conducted under the superv1s1on of the Commission in a manner designed to afford the affected employees a free choice in the select­ion of their bargaining representative, if any; a tally of the results was pre­viously furnished to the parties and is attached hereto; and no meritorious ob­jections have been filed with respect to these proceedings. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The unit described in finding of fact number 3 is an appropriate unit for the purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning of RCW 41.56 and all conditions precedent to a certification have been me ­t. ------NOW, THEREFORE, it is CERTIFIED The majority of the employees of the above named employer employed in the appro­priate collective bargaining unit described in finding of fact number 3 have chosen: PUBLIC, PROFESSIONAL & OFFICE-CLERICAL EMPLOYEES & DRIVERS, LOCAL 763/IBT as their representative for the purposes of collective bargaining with their employer with respect to wages, hours and conditions of employment. Issued at OLYMPIA , Washington, this 24th day of NOVEMBER ' 19 .fil_. PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS CO
t:.-Y 1/78 STATE OF WASHINGTON BEFORE THE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT TA L LY S H E E T NAME OF EMPLOYER LAKE WASHINGTON SCHOOL DISTRICT PART 1 - CROSS-CHECK OF RECORDS The undersigned agent of the Public Employment Relations Commission certifies that he/she has conducted a cross-check of records in the above case, and that the re­sults were as follows: Number of Employees in Bargaining Unit .................................. . Number of Employee Records Examined ..................•................... Number of Employee Records Counted as Valid Evidence of Representation ... PART 2 - SECRET BALLOT ELECTION The undersigned agent of the Public Employment Relations Commission certifies that the results of the tabulation of ballots cast in the election held in the above case, and concluded on the date indicated below, were as follows: 1. Approximate number of eligible voters ........................ 2. Void B·allots.. ... .. . .. .... .. . .. .. ........ .. . . ... . . .. .. ....... .. .. .. .. PUBLIC, PROFESSIONAL & OFFICE-CLERICAL 3. Votes Cast For: EMPLOYEES & DRIVERS, 6. Votes Cast For: NO REPRESENTATION ................................... . 7. Valid Ballots Counted.(total of 3, 4, 5, and 6) ..................... . 8. Cha 11 enged Ba 11 ots ................................................... ____ 9. Valid Ballots Counted plus Challenged Ballots (total of 7 and 8) .... . 10. Number of Valid Ballots Needed to Determine Election ................. Challenges f;i:~~ not sufficient in number to affect the results of the election. . 0 The results of the election appear to be [}{!conclusive favoring choice on line~ DATE ISSUED I(., IV(} ti !913 I The undersigned acted as authorized observers in t e counting and tabula ballots indicated above. We hereby certify that the counting and tabula ing were fairly and accurately done, that the secrecy of the ballots was maintained, and that the results were as indicated above. For UfSfttC ( L>w a a, ;;kg > (flc ~ W\ ck RELATIONS COMMISSION CASE NO. 414 NUMBER 3694-E-81-704 - ---- ---- ---, ....... . ---- ..... 0 --a--LOCAL 763/IBT ( J -----~------I 3 inconclusive. SION g of We also acknowledge service of this tally. For 'Flf!Pt- !ft:e l O / 'P.,
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.