DECISIONS

Decision Information

Decision Content

MORTON GENERAL HOSPITAL, DECISION 3521-A (PECB, 1990)

Western Council of Industrial Workers, Local 2767 v. Morton General Hospital

                                         INTERIM CERTIFICATION

 

This case comes before the Public Employment Relations Commission on timely objections filed by the employer, assigning error to an eligibility ruling issued by Executive Director Marvin L. Schurke.

 

The petition for investigation of a question concerning representa­tion was filed in this matter on November 7, 1989.  The Western Council of Industrial Workers, Local 2767, sought certification as exclusive bargaining represen­tative of certain employees of Morton General Hospital.  Issues were framed concerning the propriety of the petitioned-for bargaining unit and concerning the eligibility of certain claimed supervisors. 

 

After a hearing, the Executive Director issued a Direction of Election on June 29, 1990.  He overruled the employer's objections to the petitioned-for bargaining unit, ruled that the "environmen­tal services supervisor" was properly excluded from the bargaining unit, and ruled that the "billing supervisor" was an eligible voter within the bargaining unit. 

 

The objections filed by the employer under WAC 391-25-590(2) on July 6, 1990 were limited to the Executive Director's ruling on the "billing supervisor".

 

A representation election was conducted under the auspices of the Commission on July 26, 1990, at which time 17 votes were cast in favor of the union and two votes were cast against representa­tion.  There were two challenged ballots, one of which was cast by the disputed "billing supervisor".  No further objections were filed after the issuance of the tally of ballots.

 

The Commission has considered the matter and concludes that it should proceed with the issuance of an interim certification in this matter.  Precedent for expediting the determination of questions concerning representation is found in Franklin Pierce School District, Decision 78-C (PECB, 1976); City of Redmond, Decision 1367-A (PECB, 1982); and Olympic Memorial Hospital, Decision 3317-A (PECB, 1989).  Our procedures call for the routine issuance of interim certifi­cations where eligibility issues are reserved for post-election determination.  In this case, the outcome of the issue concern­ing the "billing supervisor" will not affect the outcome of the question concerning representation.

 

 

                       FINDINGS OF FACT

 


1.The above‑named petitioner timely filed with the Public Employment Relations Commission a petition for investigation of a question concerning representation of employees of the above‑named employer.  Said petition was accompanied by a showing of interest which was administratively determined by the Commission to be sufficient.  The employer declined voluntarily to extend recognition to the petitioner as the exclusive bargaining representative of its employees.

 

2.These representation proceedings were conducted by the Commission in the bargaining unit described as:

 

     ALL FULL-TIME AND REGULAR PART-TIME EMPLOYEES OF MOR­TON GENERAL HOSPITAL, EXCLUDING ELECTED OFFICIALS, THE ADMINISTRATOR, CONFIDENTIAL EMPLOYEES, SUPERVI­SORS, REGISTERED NURSES, AND LI­CEN­SED PRACTICAL NURSES.

 

3.All proceedings were conducted under the supervision of the Commission, in a manner designed to afford the affected  employees a free choice in the selection of their bargaining representative, if any.  A tally of the results was previously furnished to the parties, and is attached hereto.

 

4.The only objections which have been filed with respect to these proceedings concern an eligibility issue that will not affect the outcome of the question concerning representation.

 

                      CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

 

1.The Public Employment Relations Commission has jurisdiction in this matter under Chapter 41.56 RCW and Chapter 391-25 WAC.

 

2.The bargaining unit described in paragraph 2 of the foregoing findings of fact is an appropriate unit for the purposes of collective bargaining under RCW 41.56.060; and all conditions precedent to an interim certification have been met.

 

NOW, THEREFORE, it is

 

                           CERTIFIED

 

The employees of the above-named employer employed in the appropri­ate collective bargaining unit described in finding of fact number 3 have chosen:

 

       WESTERN COUNCIL OF INDUSTRIAL WORKERS, LOCAL 2767

 

as their representative for the purpose of collective bargaining with their employer with respect to wages, hours and conditions of employment.

 

Issued at Olympia, Washington, the ____ day of ____________, 1990.

 

                        PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION

 

 

                        JANET L. GAUNT, Chairperson

 

 

                        MARK C. ENDRESEN, Commissioner

 

 

                        JOSEPH F. QUINN, Commissioner             

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.