STATE OF BEFORE THE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION In the Matter of the Petition of KING COUNTY WATER DISTRICT NO. 5 Involving certain of its employees represented by: RETAIL STORE EMPLOYEES UNION, LOCAL 1001. CERTIFICATION Appearances: For Petitioner: ROGER A. YOCKEY, For Employer: C. KENNETH GROSSE, FINDINGS 1. The above-named Petitioner timely filed with the Commission a petition for investigation of a question concerning representation of employees of the above-named employer; said petition was accompanied by a showing of interest which was administratively determined by the Commission to be sufficient; and the employer declined voluntarily to extend recognition to the Petitioner as the exclusive bargaining representative of its employees. 2. The organization(s), if any, listed as intervention in the captioned proceedings; was in each case supported by a showing of interest which was determined by the Commission to be sufficient. 3. These representation proceedings were bargaining unit described as: ALL OFFICE EMPLOYEES OF THE EMPLOYER'S OFFICE AVENUE S.E., KENT, WASHINGTON. EXCLUDED: SUPERVISORS. 4. All proceedings were conducted under the superv1s1on of the Commission in a manner designed to afford the affected employees a free choice in the selection of their bargaining representative, if any; a tally of the results was previously furnished to the parties and is attached hereto; have been filed with respect to these proceedings. CONCLUSIONS The unit described in finding of fact number 3 is an purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning of RCW conditions precedent to a certification have been met. NOW, THEREFORE, it is CERTIFIED The majority of the employees of the appropriate collective bargaining unit described in finding of fact number 3 have chosen: . NO REPRESENTATION as their representative -for the purposes of collective bargaining with their employer with respect to wages, hours and conditions of employment. Issued at OLYMPIA , Washington, this WASHINGTON TYPE OF PROCEDURE: (Check One) I XI - Representation Election I I - Cross-Check of Records CONDUCTED PURSUANT TO: (Check One) ~/ - Consent Agreement I I - PERC Direction Case Number 3529-E-81-687 Decision Number 1353 - PECB RETAIL STORE EMPLOYEES UNION, LOCAL 1001 ATTORNEY AT LAW OF FACT intervenors above timely moved for and said motion(s) for intervention administratively conducted by the Commission in the LOCATED AT 30033 - 188TH FIELD STAFF, GUARDS AND and no meritorious objections OF LAW appropriate unit for the 41.56 ; and all above named employer employed in the 26TH day of __J_ A_N_UA_R_Y_ __, 19~. eoMMISSION
t.-::1 l/}8 STATE OF WASHINGTON BEFORE THE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION f1:M~ T AT I. . Y S H E E T NAME OF CASE EMPLOYER (~::s:#J6: 6ov vrr W+reit. Ozsr. FICJS NUMBER SS;l.'J-€ -J?/-b 8'/ -------------The undersigned agent he Public Employment Relations CJllmlfsSlO';;certifies that he/she has conducted a cross- k of records in th ---abOve case, and that the results were as follows: Number of Employees in Bargaining_.Uwi-t ......... . Employee Records Counted as Valid Evidence of Representation ... PART 2 - SECRET BALLOT ELECTION The undersigned agent of the Public Employment Relations Commission certifies that the results of the tabulation of ballots cast in the election held in the above case, and concluded on the date indicated below, were as follows: 1. Approximate number of eligible voters ................................ c2.-2 . Vo i d Ba 11 ot s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (:!) 3. Votes Cast For: U Ft W ~ /DO I / 5. Votes Cast For: ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-6. Votes Cast For: NO REPRESENTATION ................................... !cse. f!l!l!F- I 7. Valid Ballots Counted.(total of 3, 4, 5, and 6)...................... d-8. Cha 11 e_nged Ba 11 ots. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . CJ 9. Valid Ballots Counted plus Challenged Ballots (total of 7 and 8)..... :;;b._ 10. Number of Valid Ballots Needed to Determine Election................. ~ Challenges~ are no t sufficient in number to affect the results of the election. ~are . [] inconclusive. The results of the election appear to be~ conclusive favoring choice on line l.o PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION DATE ISSUED fOJ.. By Id~ cJ. ~ authorized observers in2t~counting and tabulating of ballots indicated above. We hereby certify that the counting and tabulating were fairly and accurately done, that the secrecy of the ballots was maintained, and that the results were as indicated above. We also ack owl ge s :l}.! --~this tally. For_,%,C, {.()_.~ For . / ~- · ~&!::U l ~ 11= !Wl ~-~
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.