DECISIONS

Decision Information

Decision Content

           

 

STATE OF WASHINGTON

 

BEFORE THE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION

 

 

In the matter of the petition of:

 

WASHINGTON FEDERATION OF STATE EMLOYEES

 

Involving certain employees of:

 

UNIVERSITY Of WASHINGTON

 

 

CASE 23546-E-10-3593

 

DECISION 11834-A - PSRA

 

 

CERTIFICATION

Representation Election

by Direction of Election

 

 

 

Younglove & Coker, P.L.L.C., by Edward E. Younglove III, Attorney at Law, for the Washington Federation of State Employees.

 

Robert W. Ferguson, Attorney General, by Mark K. Yamashita, Assistant Attorney General, for the employer.

 

Douglas Drachler McKee & Gilbrough, LLP, by Martha Barron, Attorney at Law, for the Service Employees International Union, Local 925.

 

 

                                                            FINDINGS OF FACT

 

1.                  The above‑named petitioner filed with the Public Employment Relations Commission a petition for investigation of a question concerning representation of employees of the above‑named employer. The petition was timely filed and was accompanied by a showing of interest which was administratively determined by the Commission to be sufficient.

 

2.                  The organization(s) listed above as intervenors (if applicable) timely moved for intervention in the proceedings, and each motion for intervention was supported by a showing of interest which was administratively determined by the Commission to be sufficient.

 

3.                  These representation proceedings were conducted by the Commission in the bargaining unit described as:

 

All full-time and regular part-time civil service employees employed by the University of Washington Contact Center, excluding supervisors, confidential employees, employees in other bargaining units, and all other employees. 

 

4.                  All proceedings were conducted under the supervision of the Commission in a manner designed to afford the affected employees a free choice in the selection of their bargaining representative, if any; a tally of the results previously furnished to the parties is attached hereto; and no meritorious objections have been filed with respect to these proceedings.

 

                                             CONCLUSION OF LAW

 

The unit described in paragraph 3 of the foregoing Findings of Fact is an appropriate unit for the purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning of RCW 41.80.070.

 

All conditions precedent to a certification have been met.

 

 

NOW, THEREFORE, it is

 

                                                                    CERTIFIED

 

The employees of the above-named employer in the appropriate bargaining unit described in paragraph 3 of the foregoing Findings of Fact have chosen:

 

 

                     SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, LOCAL 925

 

 

as their representative for the purpose of collective bargaining with their employer.

 

                       

Issued at Olympia, Washington, this  25th  day of November, 2013.

 

 

PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION

 

 

 

MICHAEL P. SELLARS, Executive Director

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.