STATE OF WASHINGTON BEFORE THE rtJBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATION~ ~OMMISSION ) In the Matter of the Petition of ) TYPE OF PROCEDURE: (Check One) ) m - Representation Election MASON COUNTY ENGINEERS ) ) 0 - Cross-check of Records ) CONDUCTED PURSUANT TO: Involving Certain Employees of ) (Check One) ) m - Consent Agreement MASON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ) D - PERC Direction PUBLIC WORKS ) ) Case Number 3504-E-81-682 Decision Number 1236-A PECB CERTIFICATION Appearances: For Petitioner: GEORGE FULLERTON, MASON COUNTY ENGINEERS For Employer: MARLEY L. YOUNG, MASON COUNTY FINDINGS OF FACT 1. The above-named Petitioner timely filed with the Commission a petition for investigation of a question concerning representation of employees of the above-named employer; said petition was accompanied by a showing of interest which was administratively determined by the Commission to be sufficient; and the employer declined voluntarily to extend recognition to the Petitioner as the exclusive bargaining representative of its employees. 2. The organization(s), if any, listed as intervenors above timely moved for intervention in the captioned proceedings; and said motion(s) for intervention was in each case supported by a showing of interest which was administratively determined by the Commission to be sufficient. 3. These representation proceedings were conducted by the Commission in the bargaining unit described as: ALL NON-REPRESENTED FULL-TIME AND REGULAR PART-TIME EMPLOYEES OF THE MASON COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS. EXCLUDING THE COUNTY ROAD ENGINEER/PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR, ASSISTANT COUNTY ENGINEER/DEPUTY DIRECTOR, SUPERVISORS, SUMMER, AND TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES AS OF AUGUST 13, 1981. 4. All proceedings were conducted under the superv1s1on of the Commission in a manner designed to afford the affected employees a free choice in the selection of their bargaining representative, if any; a tally of the results was previously furnished to the parties and is attached hereto; and no meritorious objections have been filed with respect to these proceedings. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW The unit described in finding of fact number 3 is an appropriate unit for the purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning of RCW _ ___,4;..;::.1..:..·=56=-----and all conditions precedent to a certification have been met. NOW, THEREFORE, it is CERTIFIED The majority of the employees of the above named employer employed in the appropriate collective bargaining unit described in finding of fact number 3 have chosen: MASON COUNTY ENGINEERS as their representative for the purposes of collective bargaining with their employer with respect to wages, hours and conditions of employment. , 19__.fil_ unnllT~I I C'f'UllDVC Cvor11+i\/o niv-ortor
I I ti STATE OF BEFORE THE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT T.A LL Y NAME OF EMPLQYER M4\~(N Cb.JIJfy ])ePT. of. Pv8lt~ Wot?K S PART I - CROSS-CHECK OF-RECORDS The undersigned ~gent of the Public Employment Relations Corrmission certifies that he/she has conducted a cross-check of records in the above case, and that the results were as follows: Number of Employees in Bargaining Unit ..........................•••.•...• Number ·Of Emp 1o yee Records Examined ..............•............•.......... Number of Employee Records Counted as Valid Evidence of Representation •.. PART 2 -'.SECRET BALLOT ELECtION The undersigned agent of the Public Employment Relations Comnission certifies that the results of the tabulation of ballots cast in the election held in the above case, and concluded on the date indicated below, were as follows: 1. Approximate number of eligible voters................................ 2. Void Ballots......................................................... 3. Votes Cast For: MASON C.ouN TY' 5. Votes Cast For: --------------------~ 6. Votes Cast For: NO REPRESENTATION..... . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . . . . 7. Valid Ballots Counted.{total of 3, 4, 5, and 6). ..... ... ..... ... . ... . 8. Challe.nged Ballots ........... ··.·..................................... 9. Valid Ballots Counted plus Challenged Ballots (total of 7 and 8)..... 10. Number of Valid Ballots Needed to Determine Election ................ . Challena .., es Q,are no t sufficient in number to affect the results of the election . ~are . b D inconclusive. The results of thee 1 ection appear to DATE ISSUED 3 S.E// t9P I The undersigned acted as authorized observers in ballots indicated above. We hereby certify that the counting and tabu ating were fairly and accurately done, that the secrecy of the ballots was maintained, and that the results were as indicated above. WASHINGTON RELATIONS COMMISSION. S H E E T CASE NUMBER 3':>6 '{ ~ f-'ll - ~?Z - -----------I 0 0 EN&ttJ SE..K S ~ 0 C::, 3 ? /" --5--e ~conclusive favoring choice on line~, PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION counting and tabul ing of We also acknowledge service of this tally. For !JtA[o>J Wo/CK.S
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.