STATE OF WASHINGTON BEFORE THE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION In the Matter of the Petition of GARY G. OLSON, ET AL Involving Certain Employees of CITY OF OMAK CERTIFICATION Appearances: For Petitioner: MIKAEL W. CRAMER, For Employer: CLARA M. NEAL, CITY F.or Intervenor: PAUL SEARS, STAFF REPRESENTATIVE, W.S.C.C.C.E. FINDINGS 1. The above-named Petitioner timely filed with the Commission a petition for investigation of a question concerning representation of employees of the above-named employer; said petition was accompanied by a showing of interest which was administratively determined by the Commission to be sufficient; and the employer declined voluntarily to extend recognition to the Petitioner as bargaining representative of its employees. 2. The organization(s), if any, listed as intervention in the captioned proceedings; was in each case supported by a showing of interest which was determined by the Commission to be sufficient. 3. These representation proceedings were bargaining unit described as: INCLUDED: All full-time and regular part-time emplpyees of the City of Omak, Washington police department .• · EXCLUDED: Chief of police, assistant chief of police, and all other employees of the City of Omak, Washington. 4. All proceedings were conducted under the supervision of the Commission in a manner designed to afford the affected employees a free choice in the selection of their bargaining representative, if any; a tally of the results was previously furnished to the parties and is attached hereto; have been filed with respect to these proceedings. CONCLUSIONS The unit described in finding of fact number 3 is an purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning of RCW conditions precedent to a certification have been met. NOW, THEREFORE, it is CERTIFIED The majority of the employees of the appropriate collective bargaining unit described in finding of fact number 3 have chosen: . NO REPRESENTATION as their representative for the purposes employer with respect to wages, hours and conditions of employment . Issued at OLYMPIA , Washington, this TYPE OF PROCEDURE: (Check One) /-Y:-/ - Representation Election I / - Cross-Check of Records CONDUCTED PURSUANT TO: (Check One) ;-y:-; - Consent Agreement I I - PERC Direction Case Number 3775-E-81-718 Decision Number 1338 - PECB POLICE OFFICER CLERK OF FACT the exclusive intervenors above timely moved for and said motion(s) for intervention administratively conducted by the Cammi ss ion in the and no meritorious objections OF LAW appropriate unit for the 41.56.060 ; and all above named employer employed in the of collective bargaining with their • 30th day of DECEMBER '19~. PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATk' l
1:.-::1 1/78 STATE OF WASHINGTON BEFORE THE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION T A L L Y S H E E T NAME OF CASE ,o EMPLOYER C17T et: OMIJk..., wA. NUMBER 37175"-c-et- 71a - CROSS-CHECK OF RECORDS The undersigned age the Public Employment Relations that he/she has conducted a cro results were as follows: Number of Employees PART 2 - SECRET BALLOT ELECTION The undersigned agent of the Public Employment Relations Commission certifies that the results of the tabulation of ballots cast in the election held in the above case, and concluded on the date indicated below, were as follows: 1. Ap.proximate number of eligible voters................................ 10 2. Void Ballots ........................................................ . ----3. Votes Cast For: ~?M~~oFC~ <t@frry &Wbft".S, ~o .. . ___ 4. Votes Cast For: ~-------------------5. Votes Cast For: ~-------------------6. Votes Cast For: NO REPRESENTATION.................................... i~ 7. Valid Ballots Counted.(total of 3, 4, 5, and 6). ... .. . .. .. .. . . . . . . .. . 8 8. Cha 11 e_nged Ba 11 ots ................................................... ____ 9. Valid Ballots Counted plus Challenged Ballots (total of 7 and 8)..... 1f' 10. Number of Valid Ballots Needed to Determine Election................. .,:;-Challenges~:~: not sufficient in number to affect the results of the election. . [] inconclusive. The results of the election appear to be~ conclusive favoring choice on line ~ PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION DATE ISSUED ..Dez_, 2 Z., / 9~ J By {)tW~ ti ~'%!.d~ The undersigned acted ;s authorized observer~n~tiTl90f ballots indicated above. We hereby certify that the counting and tabulating were fairly and accurately done, that the secrecy of the ballots was maintained, and that the results were as indicated above. We also acknowledge service of this tally. For Wi~L~.!)[-_,~ For Cl!/' DF OMAK ~ ~ft~.-
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.