DECISIONS

Decision Information

Decision Content

                                                                                                                             STATE OF WASHINGTON

 

                                                                             BEFORE THE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION

 

 

In the matter of the petition of:                    )

)

LYNNWOOD POLICE MANAGEMENT GUILD       )                      CASE 21909-E-08-3387

)

Involving certain employees of:                   )                      DECISION 10201 - PECB

)

CITY OF LYNNWOOD                                                                                         )                      CERTIFICATION

)                      Cross-check by

___________________________________)       Agreement of Parties

 

 

 

Steve Rider, Commander, for the petitioner.

 

Inslee Best Doezie and Ryder by Katherine F. Weber, Attorney at Law, for the employer.

 

 

                                                                                                                                    FINDINGS OF FACT

 

1.                  The above‑named petitioner filed with the Public Employment Relations Commission a petition for investigation of a question concerning representation of employees of the above‑named employer. The petition was timely filed and accompanied by a showing of interest which was administratively determined by the Commission to be sufficient. No other organization is known to claim to represent the employees involved.

 

2.                  These representation proceedings were conducted by the Commission in the bargaining unit described as:

 

ALL FULL-TIME AND REGULAR PART-TIME SUPERVISORY LAW ENFORCEMENT PERSONNEL OF THE CITY OF LYNNWOOD POLICE DEPARTMENT, EXCLUDING CONFIDENTIAL EMPLOYEES, NONSUPERVISORY PERSONNEL AND ALL OTHER EMPLOYEES.

 

3.                  All proceedings were conducted under the supervision of the Commission in a manner designed to afford the affected employees a free choice in the selection of their bargaining representative, a confidential cross-check of employer and union documents has been conducted by the Commission staff and a tally of the results previously furnished to the parties is attached hereto; and no meritorious objections have been filed with respect to these proceedings.


 

                                             CONCLUSION OF LAW

 

1.                  The unit described in paragraph 2 of the foregoing Findings of Fact is an appropriate unit for the purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning of RCW 41.56.060.

 

2.                  All conditions precedent to a certification have been met.

 

 

NOW, THEREFORE, it is

 

 

                                                                    CERTIFIED

 

 

The employees of the above-named employer in the appropriate bargaining unit described in paragraph 2 of the foregoing Findings of Fact have chosen:

 

 

                                    LYNNWOOD POLICE MANAGEMENT GUILD

 

 

as their representative for the purpose of collective bargaining with their employer.

 

 

Issued at Olympia, Washington, this 8th day of October, 2008.

 

 

PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION

 

 

 

 

CATHLEEN CALLAHAN, Executive Director

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.