DECISIONS

                                                                                                                             STATE OF WASHINGTON

                                                                             BEFORE THE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION

In the matter of the petition of:                    )

)

SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL                      )

UNION, LOCAL 519                                                                                              )                      CASE 18785-E-04-2980

)

Involving certain employees of:                   )                      DECISION 8824 - PECB

)

CITY OF KIRKLAND                                                                                               )                      CERTIFICATION

)                      Cross-check by

___________________________________)       Agreement of Parties

Dustin Federick, Business Manager, for the petitioner.

William Evans, Assistant City Attorney, for the employer.

                                                                                                                                    FINDINGS OF FACT

1.                  The above‑named petitioner filed with the Public Employment Relations Commission a petition for investigation of a question concerning representation of employees of the above‑named employer. The petition was timely filed and accompanied by a showing of interest which was administratively determined by the Commission to be sufficient. No other organization is know to claim to represent the employees involved.

2.                  These representation proceedings were conducted by the Commission in the bargaining unit described as:

ALL COMMISSIONED LIEUTENANTS OF THE CITY OF KIRKLAND POLICE DEPARTMENT, EXCLUDING SUPERVISORS, CONFIDENTIAL EMPLOYEES AND ALL OTHER EMPLOYEES.

3.                  All proceedings were conducted under the supervision of the Commission in a manner designed to afford the affected employees a free choice in the selection of their bargaining representative, a confidential cross-check of employer and union documents has been conducted by the Commission staff and a tally of the results previously furnished to the parties is attached hereto; and no meritorious objections have been filed with respect to these proceedings.

                                             CONCLUSION OF LAW

1.                  The unit described in paragraph 2 of the foregoing Findings of Fact is an appropriate unit for the purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning of 421.56.060 RCW.

2.                  All conditions precedent to a certification have been met.

NOW, THEREFORE, it is

                                                                    CERTIFIED

The employees of the above-named employer in the appropriate bargaining unit described in paragraph 2 of the foregoing Findings of Fact have chosen:

SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, LOCAL 519

as their representative for the purpose of collective bargaining with their employer.

Issued at Olympia, Washington, this 4th day of January, 2005.

PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION

MARVIN L. SCHURKE, Executive Director