E-10 STATE OF WASHINGTON 4/v7 BEFORE THE "8LIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS.MMISSION ) In the Matter of the Petition of } ) BREMERTON POL ICE ) MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION ) ) Involving Certain Employees of ) ) CITY OF BREMERTON ) ) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ยท) CERTIFICATION Appearances: For Petitioner: Wilson C. Maves, Jr. For Employer: Armand Tiberio FINDINGS OF 1. The above-named Petitioner timely filed with the Commission a petition for investigation of a question concerning representation of employees of the above-named employer; said petition was accompanied by a showing of interest which was administratively determined by the Commission to be sufficient; and the employer declined voluntarily to extend recognition to the Petitioner as the exclusive bargaining representative of its employees. 2. The organization(s), if any, listed as intervenors above timely moved for intervention in the captioned proceedings; and said motion(s) for intervention was in each case supported by a showing of interest which was administratively deterniined by the Co1T111ission to be sufficient. 3. These representation proceedings were conducted by the Co111T1ission in the bargaining unit described as: All full time and regular part-time police officers above the rank of sergeant, excluding the Chief of Police, Deputy Chi.efs of Police and all other employees, 4. All proceedings were conducted under the supervision of the Conmission in a manner designed to afford the affected employees a free choice in the selection of their bargaining representative, if any; a tally of the results was previously furnished to the parties and is attached hereto; and no meritorious objections have been filed with respect to these proceedings. CONCLUSIONS The unit described in finding of fact number 3 is an appropriate unit for the purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning of RCW and all conditions precedent to a certification have been met. NOW, THEREFORE, it is CERTIFIED The majority of the employees of the above named employer employed in the appropriate collective bargaining unit described in finding of fact number 3 have chosen: BREMERTON POLICE MANAGEMENT as their representative for the purposes of collective bargaining with their employer with respect to wages, hours and conditions of employment. Issued at Olympia , Washington, this PUBLIC By: TYPE OF PROCEDURE: (Check One) 0 - Representation Election [iJ - Cross-check of Records CONDUCTED PURSUANT TO: (Check One} CJ - Consent Agreement 0 - PERC Direction Case Number 3805-E-81-725 Decision Number 1322 - PECB FACT OF LAW -41.56 ------ASSOCIATION 11th day of December ' 19_.fil_. EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COr+tISS ยทV_ ...... Executive Director
E-9 1/78 ... ' . STATE OF WASHINGTON BEFORE THE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION TA L LY S H E E T NAME OF CASE EMPLOYER City of Bremerton NUMBER 3805-E-81-725 PART 1 - CROSS-CHECK OF RECORDS The undersigned agent of the Public Employment Relations Commission certifies that he/she has conducted a cross-check of records in the above case, and that the results were as follows: Number of Employees in Bargaining Unit................................... 3 Number of Employee Records Examined...................................... ~ Number of Employee Records Counted as Valid Evidence of Representation... .:::3 PART 2 - SECRET BALLOT ELECTION The undersigned agent of the Public Employment Relations Corrrnission certifies that the results of the tabulation of ballots cast in the election held in the above case, and concluded on the date indicated below, were as follows: 1. Approximate number of eligible voters ............................... . ----2. Void Ballots ........................................................ . ----3. Votes Cast For: -------------------~ 4. Votes Cast For: -------------------~ 5. Votes Cast For: -------------------~ 6. Votes Cast For: NO REPRESENTATION ................................... . ----7. Valid Ballots Counted.{total of 3, 4, 5, and 6) ..................... . ----8. Cha 11 e_nged Ba 11 ots ................................................... ____ 9. Valid Ballots Counted plus Challenged Ballots (total of 7 and 8) .... . ----10. Number of Valid Ballots Needed to Determine Election ................ . ----Challenges~:~: not su . ff icient in numbe B r to affect the results of the election. inconclusive. The results of the election appear to be conclusive favoring choice on line DATE ISSUED /::/ - L/- 5/ The undersigned acted as authorized observers in the ballots indicated above. We hereby certify that the fairly and accurately done, that the secrecy of the that the results were as indicated above. -we also For -------------~ For CITY OF BREMERTON For BREMERTON POLICE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION
You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.