DECISIONS

Decision Information

Decision Content

                                                                                                                             STATE OF WASHINGTON

 

                                                                             BEFORE THE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION

 

 

In the matter of the petition of:                    )

)

ISSAQUAH POLICE OFFICERS                                                                       )

ASSOCIATION                                                                                                            )                      CASE 16794-E-02-2774

)

Involving certain employees of:                   )                      DECISION 7929 - PECB

)

CITY OF ISSAQUAH                                                                                                )                      CERTIFICATION

)                      Cross-check by

___________________________________)       Agreement of Parties

 

 

Tom Griffith, Union Representative, appeared on behalf of the petitioner.

 

Cabot Dow, Attorney at Law, and Ruben Nieto, Human Resources Director, appeared on behalf of the employer.

 

 

 

                                                                                                                                    FINDINGS OF FACT

 

1.                  The above‑named petitioner filed with the Public Employment Relations Commission a petition for investigation of a question concerning representation of employees of the above‑named employer. The petition was timely filed and accompanied by a showing of interest which was administratively determined by the Commission to be sufficient. No other organization is know to claim to represent the employees involved.

 

2.                  These representation proceedings were conducted by the Commission in the bargaining unit described as:

 

 

ALL COMMISSIONED LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS OF THE CITY OF ISSAQUAH POLICE DEPARTMENT, EXCLUDING SUPERVISORS, CONFIDENTIAL EMPLOYEES, SERGEANTS AND ALL OTHER EMPLOYEES.

 

 


3.                  All proceedings were conducted under the supervision of the Commission in a manner designed to afford the affected employees a free choice in the selection of their bargaining representative, a confidential cross-check of employer and union documents has been conducted by the Commission staff and a tally of the results was previously furnished to the parties is attached hereto; and no meritorious objections have been filed with respect to these proceedings.

 

                                             CONCLUSION OF LAW

 

1.                  The unit described in paragraph 2 of the foregoing Findings of Fact is an appropriate unit for the purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning of 41.56.060.

 

2.                  All conditions precedent to a certification have been met.

 

 

NOW, THEREFORE, it is

 

 

                                                                    CERTIFIED

 

 

The employees of the above-named employer in the appropriate bargaining unit described in paragraph 2 of the foregoing Findings of Fact have chosen:

 

 

                                    ISSAQUAH POLICE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION

 

 

as their representative for the purpose of collective bargaining with their employer.

 

 

Issued at Olympia, Washington, this 9th day of December, 2002.

 

 

PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION

 

 

 

 

MARVIN L. SCHURKE, Executive Director

 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.