DECISIONS

                                                                                                                             STATE OF WASHINGTON

                                                                             BEFORE THE PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION

In the matter of the petition of:                    )

)

LAKE STEVENS POLICE GUILD                                             )                      CASE 18884-E-04-2995

)

Involving certain employees of:                   )                      DECISION 8838 - PECB

)

CITY OF LAKE STEVENS                                                              )                      CERTIFICATION

)                      Cross-check by

___________________________________)       Agreement of Parties

Emmal Skalbania and Vinnedge by Sydney D. Vinnedge, Attorney at Law, for the petitioner.

Keithly Weed Graafstra and Benson by Craig Knutson, Attorney at Law, for the employer.

                                                                                                                                    FINDINGS OF FACT

1.                  The above‑named petitioner filed with the Public Employment Relations Commission a petition for investigation of a question concerning representation of employees of the above‑named employer. The petition was timely filed and accompanied by a showing of interest which was administratively determined by the Commission to be sufficient. No other organization is know to claim to represent the employees involved.

2.                  These representation proceedings were conducted by the Commission in the bargaining unit described as:

ALL FULL-TIME AND REGULAR PART-TIME NON-COMMISSIONED EMPLOYEES OF THE CITY OF LAKE STEVENS POLICE DEPARTMENT, EXCLUDING SUPERVISORS AND CONFIDENTIAL EMPLOYEES.

3.                  All proceedings were conducted under the supervision of the Commission in a manner designed to afford the affected employees a free choice in the selection of their bargaining representative, a confidential cross-check of employer and union documents has been conducted by the Commission staff and a tally of the results previously furnished to the parties is attached hereto; and no meritorious objections have been filed with respect to these proceedings.

                                             CONCLUSION OF LAW

1.                  The unit described in paragraph 2 of the foregoing Findings of Fact is an appropriate unit for the purposes of collective bargaining within the meaning of 41.56.060 RCW.

2.                  All conditions precedent to a certification have been met.

NOW, THEREFORE, it is

                                                                    CERTIFIED

The employees of the above-named employer in the appropriate bargaining unit described in paragraph 2 of the foregoing Findings of Fact have chosen:

                                                 LAKE STEVENS POLICE GUILD

as their representative for the purpose of collective bargaining with their employer.

Issued at Olympia, Washington, this 14th day of January, 2005.

PUBLIC EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS COMMISSION

MARVIN L. SCHURKE, Executive Director